USPTO serial 76353037
106.5 THE ZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 106.5 THE ZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sidney R. Brown
SIDNEY R BROWN JONES DAY1420 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 800ATLANTA, GA 30309-3053UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Radio broadcasting services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |