Drawing for EVERSTREAM

USPTO serial 76354596

EVERSTREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WINTER, ELIZABETH
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERSTREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert C. Faber, Esq

ROBERT C FABER ESQ OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN, LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Advertising campaign management software used by two-way communications entities such as cable and satellite television service providers, wireless communication providers, providers of communication over a global computer network and entities servicing such providers, that enables streamlined campaign management and delivery capabilities to traffic and manage advertisements across interactive television and broadband platformsACTIVE—
035Licensing of computer software for interactive media and two-way communication entities; advertising and marketing services, namely, the collection for others and dissemination of customer marketing dataACTIVE—
042Software development for interactive media and two-way communications entities and licensing of intellectual property for others including patents and trademarksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 8, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 18, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 3, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 14, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance