Drawing for KINNEY

USPTO serial 76355050

KINNEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, MARY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KINNEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David H. Chervitz

DAVID H CHERVITZ POLSTER, LIEDER, WOODRUFF, & LUCCHESISTE 20012412 POWERSCOURT DRST LOUIS, MO 63131

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 7, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 19, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Oct 19, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 15, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 15, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance