Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76355817?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76355817. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns PARIMAX ENTERTAINMENT?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76355817, the listed owner(s) include: Magna Entertainment Corp., Magna Entertainment Corp., MI DEVELOPMENTS US FINANCING, INC., MI DEVELOPMENTS INVESTMENTS INC..

What is USPTO serial number 76355817?

Serial number 76355817 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark PARIMAX ENTERTAINMENT. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of PARIMAX ENTERTAINMENT?

PARIMAX ENTERTAINMENT (76355817) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover PARIMAX ENTERTAINMENT?

The public record lists International Classes: 036, 041. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 76355817

PARIMAX ENTERTAINMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Jan 8, 2002
Status date: Jun 20, 2011
Registration date: —
Examiner: KING, LINDA M
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARIMAX ENTERTAINMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Magna Entertainment Corp.
Aurora, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Magna Entertainment Corp.
Magna Entertainment Corp.
Aurora, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Magna Entertainment Corp.
MI DEVELOPMENTS US FINANCING, INC.
AURORA, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by MI DEVELOPMENTS US FINANCING, INC.
MI DEVELOPMENTS INVESTMENTS INC.
AURORA, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by MI DEVELOPMENTS INVESTMENTS INC.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew M. Abrams

Andrew M. Abrams Fish & Richardson P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
036	Betting services and parimutuel wagering services and sports wagering services namely, providing on-line, Internet and electronic wagering, telephone and interactive television account wagering, inter-track, off-track and on-track wagering on horse races, dog races and other sporting events	ACTIVE	—
041	Casino services, namely, providing featuring video lottery terminals, slot machines and casino games; entertainment services, namely, organizing and conducting thoroughbred horse races, standardbred horse races, quarter horse races and dog races; providing horse race and dog race exhibitions; operating golf courses and golf clubs; providing participation type entertainment in an amusement and entertainment park namely, horse races, amusement park services, organizing and conducting entertainment in the nature of live performances by musical groups, singers and dancers in stage shows, night club shows, contests, dances and parties; television show production services; providing facilities for game arcade services; providing party planning services; live magic shows; and providing an Internet site in the field of sports and entertainment events, including background information therefore	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Oct 26, 2011	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Jun 20, 2011	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2011	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2010	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Dec 1, 2010	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Nov 5, 2010	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
Nov 4, 2010	EX5G	SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED	—
Nov 2, 2010	EXT5	SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED	—
Nov 2, 2010	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2010	ASGN	AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	—
May 22, 2010	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
May 21, 2010	EX4G	SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED	—
May 20, 2010	EXT4	SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED	—
May 20, 2010	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2009	EX3G	SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	—
Nov 13, 2009	EXT3	SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED	—
Nov 13, 2009	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2009	EX2G	SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	—
Apr 30, 2009	EXT2	SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	—
Apr 30, 2009	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 4, 2008	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Sep 4, 2008	AITU	CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	—
Aug 28, 2008	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Aug 28, 2008	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2008	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 4, 2008	ETOP	EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED	—
Apr 1, 2008	CHPB	POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED	—
Mar 20, 2008	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Dec 18, 2007	ETOF	EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED	—
Nov 20, 2007	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2007	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Oct 15, 2007	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Oct 10, 2007	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Oct 9, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 9, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 9, 2007	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Oct 7, 2007	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Oct 7, 2007	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Sep 14, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 14, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2007	GNSI	INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Apr 17, 2007	CNSI	SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN	—
Mar 31, 2007	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Mar 31, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Sep 13, 2006	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Sep 13, 2006	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Aug 23, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Aug 10, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 10, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2006	GNSI	INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Apr 7, 2006	CNSI	SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN	—
Apr 5, 2006	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Nov 3, 2005	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Oct 4, 2005	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Oct 4, 2005	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Aug 4, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jul 27, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 27, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2005	GNSI	INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Apr 25, 2005	CNSI	SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN	—
Mar 4, 2005	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Aug 2, 2004	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Jul 28, 2004	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 24, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 24, 2004	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 3, 2004	GNSI	INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
May 29, 2004	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Mar 23, 2004	CFIT	CASE FILE IN TICRS	—
Dec 5, 2002	CNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED	—
Oct 30, 2002	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 7, 2002	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 7, 2002	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Oct 3, 2002	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 3, 2002	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2002	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—