USPTO serial 76365573
FIREFLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIREFLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTON J. HOPEN
ANTON J HOPEN SMITH & HOPEN PA15950 BAY VISTA DR STE 220CLEARWATER, FL 33760UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Systems for alphanumeric text entry, namely, hand-held and desktop computer input keyboards and keypads | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2007 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |