USPTO serial 76370050
THE BOP-A-LOTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE BOP-A-LOTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HOLLYWOOD, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. Eichler
PETER M EICHLER ESQ JENNINGS, STROUSS & SALMON PLCSTE 300PROMENADE CORPORATE CTR 16427 N SCOTSCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254-1597Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded audio and video cassette tapes, compact discs, phonograph records, CD-Rom's featuring music, films and television programs, games apparatus that is adapted or intended for use with a television; computer game machines containing memory devices namely discs; games that are "self contained", that can be attached to a television and also has its own display; eyeglasses and sunglasses; electronically or magnetically activated pre-paid telephone debit cards; magnets; downloadable computer game software | ACTIVE | Oct 26, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WONDERFUN LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Fossati, Stephen
- Other trademarks owned by Fossati, Stephen
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named THE BOP-A-LOTS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |