USPTO serial 76371655
ROOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOHR, AMY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MONA ROY
CATHERINE R KEENAN KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated herbal products, namely, cosmetics with essential oils for personal use, foundation, blusher, eye liner, eye shadow, and lip color, lip gloss, lip balms, lip liners, lip creams, lipsticks, perfumes, natural toilet water, herbal face packs; aromatic blend of essential oils for personal use; herbal toothpaste; non-medicated herbal skin care products, namely, body creams, body oils, body lotions, facial creams and lotions, eye creams, eye lotions, body powders, soaps, oils, toners, bath powders, bath and massage oils, massage creams, facial masks, scrubs, creams and moisturizers, skin cleansers, exfoliating scrubs, masks and packs, skin tonics, shower gels, skin exfoliating creams and lotions, sun protection lotions, creams and oils; non-medicated hair care products, namely, hair lotions, hair oils, shampoos, conditioners, hair creams, gels, hair color, hair tonics, hair and scalp moisturizers, hair powders, and hair fixatives; non-medicated nail care products, namely, nail creams, nail enamels, nail hardeners, nail polishes, and nail polish removers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |