USPTO serial 76372027
E GLASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E GLASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John F. A. Earley III
JOHN F A EARLEY III HARDING, EARLEY, FOLLMER & FRAILEY86 THE COMMONS AT VALLEY FORGE E1288 VALLEY FORGE RD P O BOX 750VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0750Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | glass, namely, glass for windows and doors (non-vehicle) and for use in buildings, excluding electric or electronic glass featuring microchips or sensors for electronic applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | glass, namely, glass for use in furniture parts, excluding electric or electronic glass featuring microchips or sensors for electronic applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |