USPTO serial 76372662
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Berkeley, CA
Berkeley, CA
Berkeley, CA
Berkeley, CA
Berkeley, CA
Berkeley, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Rosenbloum Esq.
ROBERT A ROSENBLOUM ESQ GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP3290 NORTHSIDE PKWY STE 400ATLANTA, GA 30327UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely caps, hats, bandanas, sandals and thongs, t-shirts, children's T-shirts, tank tops, shirts, sweatshirts, golf shirts, Hawaiian shirts, knit shirts, children's sweatshirts, sport jerseys and uniforms | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 18, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| May 10, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 26, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2002 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |