USPTO serial 76372696
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Software Engineering 2000 Inc.
Overland Park, KS
Software Engineering 2000 Inc.
Overland Park, KS
Software Engineering 2000 Inc.
Overland Park, KS
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary Abelev, Esq.
GARY ABELEV ESQ BAKER BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for creating, organizing and managing visual forms and data | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 14, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |