USPTO serial 76373445
TWO SISTERS/MEDICI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TWO SISTERS/MEDICI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey Dweck
JEFFREY DWECK THE LAW FIRM OF JEFFREY S DWECK, PC100 W 33RD ST STE 1013NEW YORK, NY 10001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETIC COMPACTS, COSMETIC PENCILS, EYE MAKEUP, EYE MAKEUP REMOVER, EYE PENCILS, EYE SHADOW, EYEBROW PENCILS, EYELINERS, ARTIFICIAL EYELASHES, ARTIFICIAL FINGERNAILS, FOUNDATION MAKEUP, LIP GLOSS, LIPSTICK, MAKEUP, MAKEUP REMOVER and MASCARA | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 2001 |
| 021 | HAIR BRUSHES, HAIR COMBS AND NAIL BRUSHES | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 2001 |
| 026 | HAIR ACCESSORIES, NAMELY BARRETTES, HAIR BANDS, HAIR BOWS, HAIR CLIPS, HAIR RIBBONS, PONY TAIL TIES, PONY TAIL HOLDERS, CLAWS, BOBBY PINS AND SNAP CLIPS | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |