Drawing for RMS PLATINUM

USPTO serial 76374921

RMS PLATINUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RMS PLATINUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica S. Verma

MONICA S VERMA BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP3200 NATIONAL CITY CTR1900 E 9TH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114-3485

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT, INVENTORY CONTROL MANAGEMENT, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND POINT OF SALE FUNCTIONS DIRECTED TOWARD BOOKSTORESACTIVEJul 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 31, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 21, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance