Drawing for UNIQUELY ME

USPTO serial 76376879

UNIQUELY ME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEARIN, AMY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNIQUELY ME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SUSAN C SHIN

MONICA B RICHMAN BROWN RAYSMAN MILLSTEIN FELDER & STEINER900 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041song writing servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 13, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 12, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 31, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 31, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 1, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 16, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 11, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 11, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 25, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 27, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 27, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 29, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 29, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 28, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 26, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 26, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 3, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 16, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 9, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance