USPTO serial 76380011
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Sao Paulo / SP, BR
Sao Paulo / SP, BR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. PETER HOCHBERG
D PETER HOCHBERG HORIZONTE LTDAAVENIDA IBIRAPUERA 810-04028-000SAO PAULO,BRAZIL| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | NON-ALCOHOLIC DRINKS, NAMELY, SPORTS DRINKS, ENERGY DRINKS, ISOTONICS, HYPERTONIC ENERGY DRINKS, HYPOTONIC ENERGY DRINKS, SOFT DRINKS, MINERAL WATERS, AERATED WATERS, FLAVORED WATERS, CARBONATED WATERS, FRUIT DRINKS, FRUIT JUICES, FRUIT FLAVORED DRINKS, PUNCHES, SMOOTHIES, LEMONADES, VEGETABLE JUICES AND VEGETABLE DRINKS; POWDERS, SYRUPS AND CONCENTRATES FOR MAKING SOFT DRINKS, ENERGY DRINKS, VEGETABLE DRINKS, FRUIT DRINKS, FRUIT JUICES AND SMOOTHIES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |