Drawing for BAD BOY POWER DRINK

USPTO serial 76380011

BAD BOY POWER DRINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BAD BOY POWER DRINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D. PETER HOCHBERG

D PETER HOCHBERG HORIZONTE LTDAAVENIDA IBIRAPUERA 810-04028-000SAO PAULO,BRAZIL

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032NON-ALCOHOLIC DRINKS, NAMELY, SPORTS DRINKS, ENERGY DRINKS, ISOTONICS, HYPERTONIC ENERGY DRINKS, HYPOTONIC ENERGY DRINKS, SOFT DRINKS, MINERAL WATERS, AERATED WATERS, FLAVORED WATERS, CARBONATED WATERS, FRUIT DRINKS, FRUIT JUICES, FRUIT FLAVORED DRINKS, PUNCHES, SMOOTHIES, LEMONADES, VEGETABLE JUICES AND VEGETABLE DRINKS; POWDERS, SYRUPS AND CONCENTRATES FOR MAKING SOFT DRINKS, ENERGY DRINKS, VEGETABLE DRINKS, FRUIT DRINKS, FRUIT JUICES AND SMOOTHIESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 27, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 27, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 27, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 24, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 23, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 22, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 22, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 17, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 17, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 2, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 5, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance