USPTO serial 76383084
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK A LAW CORPORATION55 S MARKET ST STE 1630TRADEMARK & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWSAN JOSE, CA 95113-2327| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers; aerated and non-aerated water and other non alcoholic beverages; fruit juices and fruit beverages; syrups for making non-alcoholic beverages; non-alcoholic cocktails; soft drinks; energy, sports, stimulating and isotonic drinks, beverages containing caffeine and/or plant extracts | ACTIVE | Oct 17, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2004 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |