Drawing for RED RHINO

USPTO serial 76383084

RED RHINO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RED RHINO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R. Greenstein

MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK A LAW CORPORATION55 S MARKET ST STE 1630TRADEMARK & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWSAN JOSE, CA 95113-2327

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beers; aerated and non-aerated water and other non alcoholic beverages; fruit juices and fruit beverages; syrups for making non-alcoholic beverages; non-alcoholic cocktails; soft drinks; energy, sports, stimulating and isotonic drinks, beverages containing caffeine and/or plant extractsACTIVEOct 17, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2004MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 28, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2004LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jul 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Jun 25, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 10, 2003IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 23, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 17, 2002EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance