Drawing for CALIFORNIA STYLE

USPTO serial 76384528

CALIFORNIA STYLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2954094Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 24, 2005
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with CALIFORNIA STYLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul G. Johnson

Paul G. Johnson MASCHOFF BRENNAN1389 Center Drive, Suite 300Park City, UT 84098United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Olive oil, [ grapeseed oil, flavored edible oils, soup, cocktail onions, ] marinated artichokes, processed artichokes, [ processed garlic, ] pimentos, [ maraschino cherries, processed olives, processed Spanish style olives, ] sun dried tomatoes, [ tapenade made from olives or garlic, processed anchovies, anchovy paste, ] marinated vegetables, namely [ carrots, ] asparagus, [ onions, sweet cherry peppers, ] Italian peppers, [ golden peppers, ] wax peppers, jalapeno peppers, casabella peppers [ , pepperoncini, celery, mushrooms, Brussel sprouts, cauliflower ]ACTIVEJan 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2025NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2025RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 19, 202589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 19, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 23, 2025E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
May 24, 2024REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
May 29, 2015NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
May 29, 2015RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
May 29, 201589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
May 29, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 12, 2015E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2010C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 15, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 28, 2010E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 25, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 25, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 31, 2005DP1B1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION—
Mar 15, 2005IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Mar 15, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 14, 2005D1BRTEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 11, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 18, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance