Drawing for SOFTFACE PROCUREMENT INTELLIGENCE SUITE

USPTO serial 76387313

SOFTFACE PROCUREMENT INTELLIGENCE SUITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOFTFACE PROCUREMENT INTELLIGENCE SUITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori Stockton

LORI STOCKTON BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Licensing of computer softwareACTIVE—
041Training in the use, operation and implementation of computer software; computer software education training services in the use, operation and implementation of computer software; computer-related services, namely, one-on-one mentoring in the use, operation and implementation of computer softwareACTIVE—
042Computer-related services, namely, computer software model development services and computer project management services; computer software consultation; computer software development; computer software installation, implementation, configuration, maintenance, and updating; technical support services offered to customers in connection with the use, operation and implementation of computer software, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; customer and technical support services related to the implementation, integration and maintenance of software for extracting, collecting, translating, organizing, normalizing, correlating, categorizing, analyzing and prioritizing unstructured data and content, procurement data and purchasing data, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in database management and for organizing unstructured dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 23, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 30, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance