USPTO serial 76391906
ZEBRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZEBRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M2P 2A9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHY J. MCKNIGHT
KATHY J MCKNIGHT SHAW PITTMAN LLP2300 N STECT. N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037-1128UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT, STORAGE, RACKING AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS NAMELY, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR INVENTORY AND DATA MANAGEMENT RELATING TO THE WAREHOUSING AND STORAGE OF GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT AND INVENTORY MANAGEMENT BOTH IN THE FIELD OF WAREHOUSE INVENTORY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |