Drawing for HY-WHEAT

USPTO serial 76392826

HY-WHEAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HY-WHEAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Harrison

MARK HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20045-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in the manufacture of food and beverages; tissue culture media, proteins, proteins for cell nutrition, hydrolised proteins, hydrolysates, bacteriological and protein based cultures all for use as a raw material in the manufacture of other goods other than for medical and veterinary use; bacteriological cultures; cultures and media for the growth of micro-organisms for use in the manufacture of food and beverages; tissues culture media, proteins, proteins for cell nutrition, hydrolised proteins, hydrolysates all used in the production of various pharmaceutical, medical or veterinary products, cultures for the production of pharmaceuticalsACTIVE—
005cultures and media for growth of micro-organisms for pharmaceutical, medical or veterinary purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 11, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 10, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 11, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 17, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 17, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 14, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance