Drawing for Serial No. 76397303

USPTO serial 76397303

Serial No. 76397303

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76397303?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard M. Ellis

HOWARD M ELLIS SIMPSON& SIMPSON, PLLC5555 MAIN STWILLIAMSVILLE, NY 14221UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Environmental services, namely architectural decontamination, indoor air quality improvement and surface remediationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2004MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 29, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 29, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 29, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 28, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 3, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 26, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 22, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 12, 2003GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance