USPTO serial 76398341
ZOOM-ZOOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 26, 2009
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ZOOM-ZOOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLPSuite 2200525 B StreetSan Diego, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | [ TABLEWARE, NAMELY, KNIVES, FORKS, AND SPOONS MADE OF PRECIOUS METALS; Wooden pestles and earthenware mortars; Hand trowels and hand spades for hydroponically growing plants in domestic gardening; Flat iron stands for non-electric irons ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | [ POSTAGE CALCULATING MACHINES ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | PRECIOUS METALS; NUTCRACKERS; PEPPER SHAKERS; SUGAR BOWLS; SALT SHAKERS; EGG STANDS, all made of precious metal; NAPKIN HOLDERS; NAPKIN RINGS; TRAY AND TOOTHPICK STANDS, ALL MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; VASES AND BASINS MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; NEEDLE BOXES MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; JEWEL BOXES MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; CANDLE EXTINGUISHERS AND CANDLE STANDS MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; POUCHES AND PURSES MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; SHOE ORNAMENTS MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; POWDER COMPACTS MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; SMOKERS' ARTICLES MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL, NAMELY, ASHTRAYS, CIGARETTE CASES AND CIGARETTE HOLDERS; PERSONAL ORNAMENTS, NAMELY, BROOCHES, AND PINS MADE OF PRECIOUS METALS; CUFF LINKS MADE OF PRECIOUS METALS; RAW DIAMONDS; SEMI PRECIOUS JEWELS; CUBIC ZIRCONIA; AND MAN MADE IMITATIONS OF SEMI-PRECIOUS JEWELS; WATCHES; TROPHIES AND PLAQUES MADE OF PRECIOUS METALS; KEY HOLDERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | [ FOOD WRAPPING FILMS FOR DOMESTIC USE; GARBAGE BAGS MADE OF PLASTICS; TAILOR'S CHALK; PRINTED FORMS; PAINTINGS AND CALLIGRAPHS; PHOTOGRAPHS; PHOTO STANDS; VERSE UTAGARUTA CARDS; KARUTA CARDS; AND STATIONERY ENVELOPES; LEAD FOR PRINTING; INK RIBBON FOR TYPING; PRINTING TYPES; ELECTRICAL STAPLERS FOR OFFICE USE; BRUSHES FOR DECORATING PAINTERS; TYPEWRITERS; OFFICE CHECK WRITING AND ENGRAVING MACHINES; SEALING WAX; HOLED TEMPLATES FOR MARKING; AQUARIUMS FOR BEAUTIFUL FISHES AND AQUARIUMS HOODS AND COVERS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | [ RAW LEATHER; RAW ANIMAL SKINS; TANNED ANIMAL HIDE; FUR; LEATHER CORD; TRAVEL BAGS; KNAPSACKS; PORTABLE CASES FOR COSMETICS, SOLD EMPTY; UMBRELLA; PARASOLS; WALKING STICKS; CANES; SHAFTS OF CANES; HORSE RIDING SADDLES AND BRIDLES; PETS CLOTHING; RAWHIDE CHEWS FOR DOGS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | [ DRINKING GLASSES; NON-ELECTRIC COOKING PANS; NON-ELECTRIC COFFEE POTS NOT OF PRECIOUS METALS; IRON KETTLES; KETTLES; DISHES, NOT OF PRECIOUS METALS; ICE PAILS; WHISKS; FISH SKEWERS; PORTABLE COLD BOXES; STRAINERS; PEPPER BOX; SUGAR BOWLS AND SALT SHAKER NOT OF PRECIOUS METALS; EGG CUPS NOT OF PRECIOUS METALS; NAPKIN-HOLDER AND NAPKIN RING NOT OF PRECIOUS METALS; SERVING TRAYS NOT OF PRECIOUS METALS; TOOTHPICK HOLDERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METALS; RICE CHESTS; BAMBOO BASKETS; CONDIMENT SHAKERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; KITCHEN AND SERVING LADLES; HAND-OPERATED COFFEE GRINDERS AND PEPPER GRINDERS; FUNNELS; GLASS BOTTLES FOR PRESERVING FOODS; CANTEENS; BOTTLE OPENERS AND CORKSCREWS; RADISH GRATERS; TART SCOOPS; PAN-REST; CHOPSTICKS; CHOPSTICK BOXES; DIPPERS; SIEVES; CHOPPING BOARDS; VACUUM BOTTLES; ROLLING PINS; GRIDIRONS; TOOTHPICKS; LEMON SQUEEZERS; WAFFLE IRONS EXCLUSIVE OF THOSE OPERATED BY ELECTRICITY; CLEANING AND WASHING KITCHEN BRUSHES AND CLOTHS; HOUSEHOLD LATEX OR PLASTIC GLOVES; HAIR BRUSHES; BRUSHES FOR PAILS; KITCHEN AND HOUSEHOLD METAL CLEANING BRUSHES; BRUSHES FOR PIPE; INDUSTRIAL SCRUBBING BRUSHES; BRUSHES FOR SHIPS; HOG BRISTLE FOR BRUSHES; CLOTHES BRUSHES; SHOE BRUSHES; SHOE HORN; SHOE SHINE CLOTH; HANDY AND CONVENIENT SHOE CLEANING BRUSHES; SHOE TREES; GLASS JARS; CERAMIC PACKING CONTAINERS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; GLASS STOPPERS; GLASS DISH COVERS; FEEDING TROUGHS; POULTRY RINGS; IRONING BOARDS; FEEDING BOWLS FOR PETS; PET BRUSHES; FLOWER POTS; HOUSEHOLD SIEVES FOR SIFTING CINDERS; BOOT JACKS; BIRD CAGES; BIRD BATHS NOT BEING STRUCTURES; WATERING CANS; SIMPLE CHAMBER POTS; COAL SCUTTLES; SOAP DISPENSERS; TOILET PAPER HOLDER; MOUSE TRAPS; FLY SWATTERS; SPATULA STAND; STICKS FOR STIRRING HOT WATER IN BATHTUBS; HAND PAILS FOR BATHROOMS; CANDLE EXTINGUISHERS AND CANDLE STANDS EXCLUSIVE OF THOSE MADE OF PRECIOUS METALS; VASES EXCLUSIVE OF THOSE MADE OF PRECIOUS METALS; INCENSE BURNERS; BASINS EXCLUSIVE OF THOSE MADE OF PRECIOUS METALS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mazda Motor Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Mazda Motor Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Mazda Motor Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ZOOM-ZOOM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2020 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2020 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Apr 28, 2019 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |