Drawing for CLASSIC PREMIUM ST. AUGUSTINE

USPTO serial 76408637

CLASSIC PREMIUM ST. AUGUSTINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3534402Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 18, 2008
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CLASSIC PREMIUM ST. AUGUSTINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID L. SIGALOW

DAVID L. SIGALOW ALLEN DYER DOPPELT MILBRATH & GILCHRI255 S. ORANGE AVENUE, Suite 1401ORLANDO, FL 32801-3460UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031St; Augustine turf grass sod and grass plugsSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2019CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Nov 18, 2017REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2014NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2014C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 29, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 11, 2014E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2009COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jan 27, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Dec 23, 2008AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Dec 23, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 10, 2008REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2008CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Sep 18, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 18, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 16, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 16, 2008EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 18, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 16, 2007CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2005ABNDABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB—
May 24, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 13, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 13, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 13, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 13, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 12, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 10, 2004OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 28, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 6, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2002AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance