USPTO serial 76408638
EOMIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2917726Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 11, 2005
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EOMIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Marquis Software Development, Inc.
Tallahassee, FL
Other trademarks owned by Marquis Software Development, Inc.
Marquis Software Development, Inc.
Tallahassee, FL
Other trademarks owned by Marquis Software Development, Inc.
Marquis Software Development, Inc.
Tallahassee, FL
Other trademarks owned by Marquis Software Development, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert S. Hightower
ROBERT S HIGHTOWER HIGHTOWER LAW FIRM241 E VIRGINIA STTALLAHASSEE, FL 32301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used to manage all aspects of offender, staff, and facility information and related activity while in prison, on parole, and on probation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2001 |
| 041 | Training services in the field of computer software installation, customization, and operation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 5, 2004 |
| 042 | Computer services related to integrated offender information systems, namely, software design services; testing of computer software services; software installation services; updating and maintenance of computer software services; custom computer programming for others; computer consultation services; computer systems analysis services; computer software and software application consulting services, namely consulting with respect to software installation, customization, operational use of integrated offender information systems comprised of computer software, and security of the software applications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 29, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Marquis Software Development, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Marquis Software Development, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Marquis Software Development, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EOMIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 6, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 1, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |