USPTO serial 76409013
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SEATTLE, WA
THE EXECUTIVE CONVERSATION, INC.
Seattle, WA
THE EXECUTIVE CONVERSATION, INC.
Seattle, WA
THE EXECUTIVE CONVERSATION, INC.
Seattle, WA
INCLINE VILLAGE, NV
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein, Esq
Martin R. Greenstein TechMark a Law Corporation4820 Harwood Road, 2nd FloorSan Jose, CA 95124-5273UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | [ educational services, namely, conducting computer-aided classes and seminars in the fields of business management, sales and marketing, customer relationships, customer and account development and concerns, financial analysis techniques and business acumen; and ] distributing course materials in the nature of proprietary computer software for data analysis [ and accompanying text books, work books, lesson plans, example problems and case studies in connection therewith ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |