USPTO serial 76410559
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MONOLITHIC SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY, INC.
SUNNYVALE, CA
Other trademarks owned by MONOLITHIC SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY, INC.
SUNNYVALE, CA
Monolithic System Technology, Inc.
Sunnyvale, CA
Other trademarks owned by Monolithic System Technology, Inc.
Monolithic System Technology, Inc.
Sunnyvale, CA
Other trademarks owned by Monolithic System Technology, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Isabelle R. McAndrews
Isabelle R. McAndrews MoSys, Inc.755 North Mathilda AvenueSunnyvale, CA 94085UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTEGRATED CIRCUITS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 3, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 13, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |