Drawing for PICTURE PERFECT

USPTO serial 76423605

PICTURE PERFECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PICTURE PERFECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay H. Begler

JAY H BEGLER BUCHANAN INGERSOLL PC140 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002A compatible toner cartridgeACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 2, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 2, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 27, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Nov 15, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 12, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 12, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Oct 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 25, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance