Drawing for ROCKVILLE COMPANY

USPTO serial 76425542

ROCKVILLE COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROCKVILLE COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas R. Bush

DOUGLAS R BUSH ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SHIRTS, HATS, SHORTS, AND BASEBALL JERSEYSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 16, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 16, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 3, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 26, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 4, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 26, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 2, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 2, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 17, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance