USPTO serial 76425547
LASSAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LASSAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
92500 Rueil Malmaison, FR
92500 Rueil Malmaison, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. M. Webner
W M WEBNER SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on 44(e)) Registration No 003073233) -- COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR STORING, QUERYING AND COMPUTING BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE DATA, BY USING HOMOLOGY BASED, STRING BASED AND PATTERN MATCHING BASED ALGORITHMS FOR USE IN THE FIELDS OF BIOINIFORMATICS AND BIOTECHNOLOGIES | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application 23144008)) PRINTED MATTERS, NAMELY, INSTRUCTION AND TEACHING MATERIALS COMPRISED OF REPORTS, JOURNALS, WORKBOOKS, TEST FORMS, BOOKLETS, INFORMATION SHEETS, OUTLINES IN THE FIELD OF BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOTECHNOLOGIES; NEWSPAPERS, MAGAZINES, LEAFLETS FEATURING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOTECHNOLOGIES; OPERATING INSTRUCTION MANUALS FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | (Based on 44(e)) Registration No 003073233) teaching and training services, namely, arranging and conducting colloquiums, congresses and conferences in the fields of Informatics and Bioinformatics | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | (Based on 44(e)) Registration No 003073233) scientific and industrial product research; computer programming for others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |