USPTO serial 76425588
HEAD2HEAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTESSICH, DANIELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEAD2HEAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Hollander
WILLIAM H HOLLANDER WYATT, TARRANT & COMBS, LLP500 W JEFFERSON ST STE 2600LOUISVILLE, KY 40202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Thoroughbred horse race betting services | ACTIVE | Oct 26, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |