Drawing for SPARKLE

USPTO serial 76428645

SPARKLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARRUTHERS, SUE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SPARKLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel Zendel

DANIEL ZENDEL LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023-7604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Spectacles, sunglasses, eyeglass and sunglass lenses, eyeglass and sunglass framesACTIVE—
014Precious metals and their alloys in general; goods in precious metals or coated therewith; jewelry; precious gemstones; horological and chronometric instruments, namely, chronometers and clocks; watches; timepiecesACTIVE—
018Leather and imitation leather; goods made of leather and imitation leather, namely, wallets, purses, straps; animal skins, hides; trunks and traveling bags; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; whips, harnesses and saddlery; cases, namely, attache cases, business card cases, cosmetic cases sold empty, key cases, overnight cases; bags, namely, all-purpose sport bags, beach bags, book bags, carry-on bags, cosmetic bags sold empty, duffel bags, garment bags for travel, overnight bags, school bags, shoulder bags, tote bags, travel bags, walletsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, shirts, hats, jackets, knitwear, pants, shorts, coats, dresses, T-shirts, jeans, jumpers, pullovers, scarves, skirts, socks, suits, sweaters, underwear, belts; footwear, headwearACTIVE—
035Advertising services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others in the field of clothing, footwear, headwear, eyewear, leather and imitation-leather goods, jewelry, cases, bags, wallets, watches, timepieces; business management services; business administration services; retail store services and online retailing services featuring clothing, footwear, headgear, eyewear, leather and imitation-leather goods, jewelry, cases, bags, wallets, watches, timepiecesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 12, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 14, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 10, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 30, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance