Drawing for TOTE-A-LOAD

USPTO serial 76434064

TOTE-A-LOAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOTE-A-LOAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan H. Petcu

JONATHAN H PETCU MOORE INGRAM JOHNSON & STEELE, LLP192 ANDERSON STMARIETTA, GA 30060UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Canvas carrying devices, namely canvas bags having four handles that are gathered to hold the contents of the bags, for carrying landscaping and outdoor materials, namely garden tools and debris, namely plants, grass clippings, leaves and landscaping debrisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 3, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 1, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 2, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 14, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 18, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 12, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance