Drawing for THERMO SAFE

USPTO serial 76434239

THERMO SAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THERMO SAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harold V. Stotland

HAROLD V STOTLAND SEYFARTH SHAW55 E MONROE ST STE 4200CHICAGO, IL 60603-5810UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001(Based on Use in Commerce) Refrigerant packs, namely packets containing a chemical solution or gel that is heated or cooled for use in an insulated container to keep items in the container at a selected temperatureACTIVEAug 15, 1961
009(Based on Intent to Use) Laboratory consumables, namely, absorbent sheets, bags and racksACTIVE—
011(Based on Intent to Use) Non-electric dry ice makersACTIVE—
016(Based on Intent to Use) Specimen mailers made of expanded polystyrene or corrugated cardbroad to mail medical or laboratory items, namely, petri dishes, tubes and slides; containers made of expanded polystyrene or corrugated cardboard for shipping hazardous or other regulated materialsACTIVE—
042(Based on Intent to Use) Testing services for others, namely, testing the physical and thermal characteristics of containers; and custom packaging design services for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 5, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 16, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 2, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance