USPTO serial 76437001
DYNASHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DYNASHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Oliff
JAMES A OLIFF OLIFF & BERRIDGE, PLCP O BOX 19928ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | unprocessed plastics for use in the manufacture of bottles, sheets, films and food packaging films; unprocessed synthetic resins for use in the manufacture of bottles, sheets, films and food packaging films | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | plastics in the form of pellets for general industrial use; and synthetic resins for use in the manufacture of bottles, sheets, films and food packaging films | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kureha Chemical Industry Company, Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Kureha Chemical Industry Company, Limited
- Other trademarks owned by KUREHA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named DYNASHIELD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |