Drawing for MODERN COMFORT

USPTO serial 76447486

MODERN COMFORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MODERN COMFORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWIN KOMEN

EDWIN KOMEN ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Common metal drawer pulls and metal door handlesACTIVE
014Drawer pulls of precious metalACTIVE
020Drawer pulls of plastic or wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, leather, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials; non-metal door handles and covered door handles including door knob covers made of leather, suede, fabric and linenACTIVE
021Drawer pulls of glass; porcelain door handlesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 16, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 17, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 11, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 14, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 16, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance