Drawing for MASO CANALI

USPTO serial 76454832

MASO CANALI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASO CANALI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT J. PATCH

Mark Lebow, Esquire YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033winesACTIVEJun 15, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 4, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 12, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 4, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 27, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 23, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 13, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Dec 13, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 10, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 27, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance