USPTO serial 76455036
SURETREAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SURETREAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway
ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS1735 MARKET ST FL 51PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Dry chemistry test system comprised of analytical reagents used to determine the amount of an analyte or analytes in a liquid sample and what occurs with respect to an analyte on addition of a reactant to the sample, such system being comprised of single or multiple reagent pads fixed to a solid inert carrier, for use in testing liquid samples from a variety of different sources in recreational, industrial, commercial, environmental and health-related applications requiring monitoring and control of the characteristics of the liquid | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 11, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |