Drawing for SUNWELL

USPTO serial 76456317

SUNWELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3298429Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 25, 2007
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SUNWELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anna Krimshtein

Anna Krimshtein Law Offices of Anna Krimshtein2203 NE 203rd TerraceMiami, FL 33180UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003skin care preparations and cosmetics, namely moisturizer, toner, cleanser, night cream, non-medicated skin serums, skin lightener, facial mask, soap for face and body, oils for face and body, bath oil, gel for face and body, shower gel, lipstick, powder for face and body, blush, mascara, eye shadow, foundation, concealer, wrinkle remover, bath foam, bath salts, bronzing powder; non-medicated suncare preparations, namely non-medicated sunscreen cream, non-medicated sunscreen lotion, non-medicated sunscreen oil, non-medicated sunscreen sticks, non-medicated sun tan lotion for the face and body, non-medicated ultra-violet protection lotions, non-medicated sun block, non-medicated sunburn care cream, non-medicated sunburn care lotion, non-medicated sunburn care sprays, non-medicated self tanner cream and lotion, non-medicated self tanner spray; hair care preparations, namely shampoo, conditioner, hair lightener, hair masks, non-medicated hair serums, hair spraySECTION 8 - CANCELLEDNov 6, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jan 28, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 5, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 23, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 23, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 5, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 5, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 20, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 22, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 30, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 11, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 7, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 22, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 22, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 28, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 22, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 1, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 23, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 15, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 30, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 9, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance