USPTO serial 76459216
RICOH GELJET PRINTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RICOH GELJET PRINTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter D. Murray
PETER D MURRAY COOPER & DUNHAM LLP1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-2601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PRINTERS, INKJET PRINTERS AND STRUCTURAL REPLACEMENT PARTS, ACCESSORIES OR PERIPHERALS THEREFORE, NAMELY, PRINTER CONTROLLERS, PRINTER DRIVERS, WIRELESS LAN BOARDS FOR PRINTER CONTROLLERS, INTERFACE CABLES, NETWORK INTERFACE BOARD, SOFTWARE FOR USE IN OPERATING PRINTERS, INK CARTRIDGES, PAPER FEEDERS, PAPER CASSETTES, SORTERS, STACKERS OR A UNIT TO ENABLE PRINTING ON BOTH SIDES OF PAPER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |