Drawing for REAL TIME TEXT PROTOCOL

USPTO serial 76460537

REAL TIME TEXT PROTOCOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with REAL TIME TEXT PROTOCOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Morton H Fry

MORTON H FRY STAIRS DILLENBECK, FINLEY & RENDON330 MADISON AVE 29T FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and manuals sold therewith as a unit for communicating Real-Time information and Data via Electronic NetworksACTIVE—
016Computer (user) manuals addressing software providing streaming of real-time data (including over proprietary servers, using proprietary data libraries, "extensions" and "function solution sets", a proprietary web browser and via a comprehensive "middleware engine" (the foregoing, hereafter, the "sub jest Matter"; printed instruction manuals relating to the foregoing subject matter; printed reports featuring the foregoing subject matter; newsletters featuring the foregoing subject matter; stationery (corporate) and brochures about the foregoing subject matter; and general "market data" and related dataACTIVE—
038Providing access to real-time information and data via electronic networksACTIVE—
042Computer programming services for others (involving the streaming of real-time data); leasing of computers (involving the streaming of real-time data); computer consultation services (involving the streaming of real-time data)-- providing information in the field of computers (involving the streaming of real-time data)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 21, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance