USPTO serial 76460537
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
London EC2A 1BR, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morton H Fry
MORTON H FRY STAIRS DILLENBECK, FINLEY & RENDON330 MADISON AVE 29T FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and manuals sold therewith as a unit for communicating Real-Time information and Data via Electronic Networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Computer (user) manuals addressing software providing streaming of real-time data (including over proprietary servers, using proprietary data libraries, "extensions" and "function solution sets", a proprietary web browser and via a comprehensive "middleware engine" (the foregoing, hereafter, the "sub jest Matter"; printed instruction manuals relating to the foregoing subject matter; printed reports featuring the foregoing subject matter; newsletters featuring the foregoing subject matter; stationery (corporate) and brochures about the foregoing subject matter; and general "market data" and related data | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing access to real-time information and data via electronic networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming services for others (involving the streaming of real-time data); leasing of computers (involving the streaming of real-time data); computer consultation services (involving the streaming of real-time data)-- providing information in the field of computers (involving the streaming of real-time data) | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |