USPTO serial 76460538
RTSL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RTSL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London EC2A 1BR, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morton H Fry
MORTON H FRY STAIRS DILLENBECK, FINLEY & RENDON330 MADISON AVE 29T FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software and manuals sold therewith as a unit for communicating real-time information and data via electronic networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Computer (user) manuals addressing software providing streaming of real-time data (including over proprietary servers, using proprietary data libraries, extensions; and function solution sets; a proprietary web browser and via a comprehensive; middleware engine; (the foregoing, hereafter, the subject matter; printed instruction manuals relating to the foregoing; subject matter; printed reports featuring the foregoing subject matter; newsletters featuring the foregoing subject matter; stationery (corporate) and brochures about the foregoing subject matter; and general; market data; and related data | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | providing access to real-time information and data via electronic networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming services for others (involving the streaming of real-time data); leasing of computers (involving the streaming of real-time data); computer consultation services (involving the streaming of real-time data); providing information in the field of computers (involving the streaming of real-time data) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Caplin Systems Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RTSL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2005 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |