USPTO serial 76462013
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm D. St. Landau
C/O DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BIOMECHANICAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM COMPRISED OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE OR A STAND-ALONE COMPUTER THAT ANALYZES POSTURE U SING INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY, TO HELP IDENTIFY THE POSTURAL INDICATORS THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH A PREDISPOSITION TO OSTEOPOROSIS AND RISK OF FRACTURES ASSOCIATED WITH OSTEOPOROSIS AND RECOMMENDS PERSONALIZED CORRECTIVE EXERCISE PROGRAMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | MEDICAL SERVICES OF ASSESSING AND ANALYZING POSTURE TO HELP IDENTIFY THE POSTURAL INDICATORS THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH A PREDISPOSITION TO OSTEOPOROSIS AND RISK OF FRACTURES ASSOCIATED WITH OSTEOPOROSIS; MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF TAKING DIGITAL IMAGES OF PATIENTS AND EXTRACTING POSTURAL VARIABLES THEREFROM; PROVIDING MEDICAL INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A REPORT PROVIDING RISK INDICES FOR OSTEOPOROSIS AND FRACTURES; MEDICAL SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF PROVIDING RECOMMENDATIONS OF PERSONALIZED CORRECTIVE EXERCISE PROGRAMS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |