USPTO serial 76464136
CAMPAIGN FOR HEALTH CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2955817Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2005
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CAMPAIGN FOR HEALTH CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Rosencrantz
MARK ROSENCRANTZ STANISLAW ASHBAUGH701 FIFTH AVE STE 4400SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services, namely, creating, designing, and implementing advertising and public service campaigns, marketing and dissemination of information on issues relating to health and health insurance; preparing and placing printed, audio, audio-visual, and on-line materials for use in advertising and public service campaigns and marketing; licensing of slogans for advertising and public service campaigns and marketing issues relating to health and health insurance; preparing and placing in all media information and advertisements for others on issues relating to health and health insurance; rendering advertising and public relations advice on issues relating to health and health insurance; and rental or licensing of on-line advertising space | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 5, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 24, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |