Drawing for SUKAL

USPTO serial 76464781

SUKAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2931293Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 8, 2005
Examiner
CLARK, GLENN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SUKAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter A. Matos

PETER A MATOS HISTORIC CORAL WAYMALLOY & MALLOY PA2800 SW THIRD AVEMIAMI, FL 33129

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001ARTIFICIAL SWEETENERSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDNov 18, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2011C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Mar 8, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 23, 2004REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 22, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 18, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Oct 26, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 15, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2004PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Sep 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 28, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 9, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 16, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 24, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 28, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 4, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance