USPTO serial 76467120
NOUVEAU MAISON FONDÉE EN 1888 MERE POULARD LE MONT SAINT MICHEL LES P'TITS MONT-SAINT-MICHEL 7OG-2.45OZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3137486Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 5, 2006
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NOUVEAU MAISON FONDÉE EN 1888 MERE POULARD LE MONT SAINT MICHEL LES P'TITS MONT-SAINT-MICHEL 7OG-2.45OZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BREWSTER TAYLOR
BREWSTER TAYLOR STITES & HARBISON PLLC1199 N FAIRFAX ST STE 900ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | MEAT; FISH; MEAT EXTRACTS; DRIED, PRESERVED, STEWED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; JELLIES FOR FOOD; DAIRY/MILK PRODUCTS EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT; CHARCUTERIE; PRESERVED MEAT, FISH, FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; PROCESSED MARINE, VEGETABLES AND MEAT PRODUCTS, NAMELY, CROQUETTES AND HAMBURGERS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH OR VEGETABLES; MEAT PASTE; PATE; POTATO CHIPS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | COFFEE; TEA; COCOA; SUGAR; ARTIFICIAL COFFEE; CEREAL PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, CEREAL BASED SNACK FOOD; CRACKERS; BREAD; SWEETENED AND SALTED BISCUITS; PASTRIES AND CONFECTIONERY; NAMELY, CHIPS, CANDY, AND CHOCOLATES; EDIBLE ICES; ICE FOR REFRESHMENT; MEAT PIES; POTATO DOUGHNUTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SANTENET SA
- Other trademarks owned by E. V. EXPANSION
- Other trademarks owned by E. V. EXPANSION
- Other trademarks owned by E. V. EXPANSION
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named NOUVEAU MAISON FONDÉE EN 1888 MERE POULARD LE MONT SAINT MICHEL LES P'TITS MONT-SAINT-MICHEL 7OG-2.45OZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |