USPTO serial 76468068
ORATOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORATOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Etobicoke, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mr. Scott W. Petersen
MR SCOTT W PETERSEN HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLC131 S DEARBORN ST FL 30CHICAGO, IL 60603-5517UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Assay kits comprised primarily of medical diagnostic reagents used for the detection of drugs in saliva | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |