USPTO serial 76468608
WOLF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WOLF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chelmsford, Essex CM3 8HQ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce A. Tassan
BRUCE A TASSAN4143 N 27TH STARLINGTON, VA 22207-5211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EYE WEAR, NAMELY, EYEGLASSES, SUNGLASSES, EYEGLASS FRAMES AND CASES; SPORTING ARTICLES FOR EQUESTRIAN SPORTS, NAMELY, HELMETS | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | RUCKSACKS AND FRAMES, STRAPS AND HARNESSES THEREFOR, BACKPACKS, TOTE BAGS, ALL-PURPOSE SPORTS BAGS, TRAVELING BAGS, SUITCASES, HOLDALLS FOR CARRYING SPORTING ARTICLES, DUFFEL BAGS, BRIEFCASES, ATTACHE CASES, WALLETS, AND PURSES; SPORTING ARTICLES FOR EQUESTRIAN SPORTS, NAMELY, RIDING CROPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | FISHING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, FISHING STRIKE INDICATORS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC FISH BITE ALARMS, REMOTE TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS, HARD CASES, PROTECTIVE LEATHER CASES, BETA LIGHTS, AND EXTENSION WIRES SOLD AS A UNIT; FISH STRIKE INDICATORS COMPRISING BOBBINS WITH FIXED ARMS ATTACHED TO THE FISHING POLES, SMALL STAINLESS STEEL WEIGHTS FOR GREATER LOADING CAPACITY, STAINLESS STEEL LINE GUIDES, AND PROTECTIVE CARRYING CASES SOLD AS A UNIT; FISH STRIKE INDICATORS, NAMELY, BOBBINS THAT ATTACH TO THE FISHING LINE, ADD-ON WEIGHTS, AND PROTECTIVE CARRYING CASES SOLD AS A UNIT; FISHING RODS, FISHING ROD HOLDERS; BUZZ BARS, NAMELY, TWO, THREE AND FOUR ROD BARS ATTACHED TO FISHING ROD HOLDERS TO ACCOMMODATE MULTIPLE FISHING RODS; BAND STICKS, NAMELY, TUBING SECURED IN THE LAND ADJOINING A BODY OF WATER DESIGNED TO HOLD BUZZ BARS AND FISHING RODS; CATAPULTS, NAMELY, SLINGSHOTS USED TO DISTRIBUTE BAIT; THROWING STICKS, NAMELY, TUBES WITH HOLLOW ENDS USED TO DISTRIBUTE BAIT; FISHING ROD BLANKS; FISHING HOOKS, FISHING LURE BOXES, FISHING LINES, FISHING TACKLE; FISHING TACKLE BOXES; ARTIFICIAL FISHING BAIT, FISHING FLOATS; FISHING LEADERS; FISHING WEIGHTS; FISHING NETS FOR SPORTSMEN; AND DEAD BAIT FLOATER STICKS USED TO SUPPORT SLOW SINKING DEAD BAIT; BAGS, CASES, CARRYALLS, AND RUCKSACKS FOR SPORTING ARTICLES, NAMELY, SKI BAGS, GOLF BAGS, FISHING BAGS, EXCLUDING BOWLING EQUIPMENT; PROTECTIVE COVERS FOR FISHING RODS AND REELS, EXCLUDING BOWLING EQUIPMENT; AND PROTECTIVE ARTICLES, NAMELY, KNEE PADS, ELBOW PADS, AND WRIST BRACES FOR ATHLETIC USE, EXCLUDING PROTECTIVE ARTICLES FOR BOWLING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fox Group Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named WOLF
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |