USPTO serial 76471748
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Fort Worth, TX
ERX NETWORK, LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ELECTRONIC RX NETWORK, LLC)
FORT WORTH, TX
Other trademarks owned by ERX NETWORK, LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ELECTRONIC RX NETWORK, LLC)
Fort Worth, TX
NASHVILLE, TN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert L. Brewer, Paige W. Mills, and Ryann M. Shcneider
Robert L. Brewer, Paige W. Mills and Ryann M. Schn Bass, Berry & Sims PLC150 3rd Avenue SouthSuite 2800Nashville, TN 37201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | providing information in the field of insurance plan information; insurance consultation services, namely, pre-screening pharmacy claims for compliance with insurance plan requirements; insurance management services, namely, insurance plan reconciliation and factoring for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2002 |
| 038 | telecommunication services, namely, data switching services for use in transmitting medical prescriptions between pharmacies and insurance providers and providing multiple user access for pharmacies and insurance providers for use in authorizing and filling prescriptions and prescription refills; providing multiple user access to an on-line database featuring drug and pharmaceutical compliance and customer order status information | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2002 |
| 042 | providing medical and physician information; providing a secure database featuring patient information and prescription histories | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 7, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 4, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |