USPTO serial 76476489
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
15048 Valenza, Alessandra, IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James V. Costigan, Esq.
James V. Costigan HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.1230 Avenue of the Americas, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Gold; silver; platinum; precious metals and their alloys; goods in precious metals and their alloys, namely, rings, bracelets, necklaces, ornamental neck chains, brooches, earrings, medals, pendants; diamonds; precious stones; jewelry; precious gemstones; cuff links and tie pins; wrist watches; watches and clocks in general; chronometers; precious metal plated jewelry; precious metal cases and other boxes for watches and jewels | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |