USPTO serial 76478509
KOSTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 25, 2006
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KOSTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SUZHOU LIOUXIN INDUSTRIAL. LTD
CHANGQIAO WUXIAN JIANGSU, CN
SUZHOU LIOUXIN INDUSTRIAL. LTD
CHANGQIAO WUXIAN JIANGSU, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Slattery
JAMES M SLATTERY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shoes, hats, gloves, hosiery, neckties, scarves, T-shirts, overcoats and vests | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |