USPTO serial 76479379
POWERCORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWERCORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lyman F. Spitzer
LYMAN F SPITZER SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP1000 JACKSONTOLEDO, OH 43624-1573UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Battery powered magnetically or microchip encodeable credit cards, debit cards, identification cards, conditional access cards and other electrical powered magnetically or microchip encodeable smart cards, tags and fobs, sold either unencoded or partially encoded, and component cores of battery powered magnetically or microchip encodeable credit cards, debit cards, identification cards, conditional access cards and other electrical powered magnetically or microchip encodeable smart cards, tags and fobs for encoding and application of printed overlays by the customer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2006 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |